Many, perhaps most, references to decimal time of day refer to it as "metric time". I have noticed, however, that advocates of the metric system get annoyed by those who want "metric time" added to the metric system, because time is already included! Although the original metric system did not include a unit of time interval, the modern SI metric system does: the second. Standard metric prefixes are commonly applied in scientific use, including milliseconds, microseconds, nanoseconds, etc. However, larger metric units are not as common, and SI has compromised by allowing non-decimal multiples, such as minutes, hours and days, to be used with metric units. So the problem with metric time is not that there is none, but that metric and older units are being used together.
Any arbitrary unit of time would work as a metric base unit. The second has been adopted, but it could have been the day or hour or anything else. The real issue is how to divide the day so that people can organize their activities. The metric system does not help, since there are 86.4 kiloseconds in a day. So instead we still use hours and minutes.
MJD 55190.3
2009/12/25
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The problem with basing metric/decimal on the day is that the length of a earth day will always be changing. Are there any proposals to establish a standard time unit based on something that does not change - like the rate of decay of some radioactive element? Then, we would need a decimal time system that allowed the day to get longer, but still give us a sense of percentage. Would it be human if the day had 1001 millidays?
ReplyDeleteThere is a unit of metric time, the second, which is defined by the vibrations of some element, based on the length of the day in 1820. This is not a problem with decimal/metric time, but for any time of day system. We already deal with it, using leap seconds. There are other solutions, as well. But the difference is not so much as a milliday but merely two milliseconds. Considering that mean time can be as much as a quarter-hour off from where the sun actually is, that standard time zones can be over a half-hour different from local mean time, and that many places shift the time back and forth a whole hour every year, I don't think that humans are going to notice a few nanodays.
ReplyDelete